韩晓静;程铭恩;袁媛;桂双英;彭华胜;
HAN Xiao-jing;CHENG Ming-en;YUAN Yuan;GUI Shuang-ying;PENG Hua-sheng;School of Pharmacy, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Research Unit(No.2019RU057), National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences;

• 1:安徽中医药大学药学院
• 2:中国中医科学院中药资源中心中国医学科学院创新单元(2019RU057)

摘要(Abstract)：

天麻作为名贵中药材,其质量评价和经验鉴别倍受历代中医药学家所关注,逐渐形成了丰富的商品规格及经验鉴别术语。该文通过对历代本草文献的梳理,探讨了天麻商品规格变迁及其经验鉴别术语的形成。发现清代以前天麻商品主要来自红天麻。清代以来,云贵地区乌天麻商品逐渐兴起,贵州天麻和云南昭通天麻开始成为主流商品之一。至此,乌天麻与红天麻成为天麻商品的2个主流商品。20世纪70年代天麻栽培成功推广以前,天麻商品来自野生资源,商品规格常根据采收时间相应分为春麻和冬麻。随着天麻栽培技术的成功推广以及野生天麻资源濒危,冬天麻已经成为市场商品主流。天麻的伪品在20世纪60—70年代显著增加,这段时期天麻的经验鉴别术语显著增多,经验鉴别具有鲜明的时代性。挖掘民间药材鉴别经验,可以推动中药材经验鉴别与时俱进发展。
Gastrodia Rhizoma, as a precious Chinese materia medica, has attracted the attention of Chinese materia medica experts in the past dynasties for the commercial specification and experimental identification, and has gradually formed a wealth of terms concerning commercial specification and experimental identification. Through combing the literatures of successive dynasties, this paper discussed the change of the commercial specification of the Gastrodiae Rhizoma and formation of its identifying terms. It has found that the Gastrodiae Rhizoma mainly came from the dried rhizomes of the Gastrodia elata f.elata before the Qing Dynasty. Since the Qing Dynasty, G. elata in Yunnan and Guizhou gradually arose and become one of sources of mainstream commodities. After that, G. elata f. glauca and G. elata f. elata were becoming the main sources of Gastrodiae Rhizoma. Before the large-scale cultivation of G. elata in the 1970 s, there is only wild G. elata over the country. In terms of commercial specification, they were often classified into Chunma and Dongma according to their harvest time. With the successful promotion of cultivation technology and the endangered wild resources of G. elata, the Dongma became the mainstream in the market. The adulterants of G. elata increased significantly in the 1960 s and 1970 s, in this period, the terms of experimental identification for G. elata also increased obviously. Experimental identification is distinctive in different times, therefore, studying experimental identification of medicinal materials helps to promote the development of the Chinese materia medica.

关键词(KeyWords)： 天麻;商品规格;经验鉴别;本草考证
Gastrodiae Rhizoma;commercial specification;experimental identification;herbal textual research

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金重大项目(81891013,81891010);; 安徽省中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目(YDZX20183400004233);; 中央本级重大增减支项目(2060302)

作者(Author): 韩晓静;程铭恩;袁媛;桂双英;彭华胜;
HAN Xiao-jing;CHENG Ming-en;YUAN Yuan;GUI Shuang-ying;PENG Hua-sheng;School of Pharmacy, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Research Unit(No.2019RU057), National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences;

Email:

DOI: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200329.102

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 詹志来,郭兰萍,金艳,等.中药材品质评价与规格等级的历史沿革[J].中国现代中药,2017,19(6):868.
• [2] 李鹏英,王海洋,李健,等.中药材商品规格等级的形成和演变[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(5):764.
• [3] 杨光,王诺,詹志来,等.中药材市场商品规格等级划分依据现状调查[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(5):761.
• [4] 彭华胜,张贺廷,彭代银,等.黄芪道地药材辨状论质观的演变及其特点[J].中国中药杂志,2017,42(9):1646.
• [5] 陈灵丽,张玲,彭华胜,等.前胡品质的影响因素及“辨状论质”[J].中华医史杂志,2018,48(1):10.
• [6] 赵玉姣,韩邦兴,彭华胜,等.石斛的历代质量评价沿革与变迁[J].中国中药杂志,2016,4(7):1348.
• [7] 唐慎微.大观本草[M].尚志钧点校.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,2002:209.
• [8] 彭华胜,王德群.生态因子与古今天麻产区的关系[J].现代中药研究与实践,2007,22(2):6.
• [9] 刘大会,龚文玲,詹志来,等.天麻道地产区的形成与变迁[J].中国中药杂志,2017,42(18):3639.
• [10] 谢宗万.中药材品种论述[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990:367.
• [11] 国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典.一部[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2015:57.
• [12] 周铉,陈心启.国产天麻属植物的整理[J].云南植物研究,1983,5(4):361.
• [13] 陶弘景.本草经集注[M].尚志钧辑校.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:186.
• [14] 苏敬.新修本草[M].尚志钧辑校.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,2004:149.
• [15] 苏颂.本草图经[M].尚志钧辑校.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1994:67.
• [16] 李时珍.本草纲目.上册[M].刘衡如,刘山永校注.北京:华夏出版社,1998:509.
• [17] 刘文泰.本草品汇精要[M].曹晖校注.北京:华夏出版社,1988:191.
• [18] 陈嘉谟.本草蒙筌[M]//本草经典补遗.陈湘萍,王淑民校注.北京:华夏出版社,1998:93.
• [19] 李中立.本草原始[M].郑金生,汪惟刚,杨梅香整理.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:116.
• [20] 龚文玲.天麻商品规格等级标准建立及其质量评价[D].武汉:湖北中医药大学,2019.
• [21] 赵燏黄.本草药品实地之观察[M].樊菊芬点校.福州:福建科技出版社,2006:61.
• [22] 陈仁山.药物出产辨[M].中国台北:新医药出版社,1930:60.
• [23] 天津市药材公司研究组.天麻辨伪的经验[J].中药通报,1957,3(5):217.
• [24] 中国医学科学院药物研究所.中药志[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1959:88.
• [25] 贵州省中药资源普查办公室.贵州中药资源[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1992:49.
• [26] 胡世林.中国道地药材[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,1989:260.
• [27] 陈存仁.中国药学大辞典.上册[M].上海:世界书局,1935:199.
• [28] 中国药学会上海分会.药材资料汇编.上册[M].上海:科技卫生出版社,1959:84.
• [29] 卫生部药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典.一部[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,1963:36.
• [30] 寇宗奭.本草衍义[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990:66.
• [31] 吴其濬.植物名实图考[M].张瑞贤,王家葵校注.北京:中医古籍出版社,2008:115.
• [32] 贾所学.药品化义[M].王小岗,郑玲校注.北京:中医古籍出版社,2012:50.
• [33] 曾育麟.中药形性经验鉴别法.上册[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1958:20.
• [34] 南京药学院药材学教研组.药材学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1960.
• [35] 国家医药管理局,中华人民共和国卫生部.七十六种药材商品规格标准[S].1984:15.
• [36] 朱圣和.中国药材商品学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990:114.
• [37] 南京中医学院.中药学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1959:571.
• [38] 屠呦呦.中药鉴别经验的学习心得[J].中医杂志,1962(6):32.
• [39] 黄仕沛.天麻的鉴别[J].新中医,1973(3),48.
• [40] 谢宗万.全国中草药汇编.上册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1975.
• [41] 赵中振,陈虎彪.中药材鉴定图典[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,2018:57.
• [42] 周光治,阮耕夫.中药形态名词术语图释[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1989:528.
• [43] 王艳红,周涛,江维克,等.天麻林下仿野生种植的生态模式探讨[J].中国现代中药,2018,20(10):1195.
• [44] 詹志来,邓爱平,谢冬梅,等.根及根茎类药材商品规格等级标准——以黄芪丹参等6种药材为例[J].中国现代中药,2019,21(6):707.
• [45] 董震初,冯祖良.几种中药真伪优劣鉴别经验[J].中药通报,1958,4(3):102.